Need help deciding on which way to go. I'm looking for a dependable build with some longivity with it. The 124 scares me with the 4.250 case bore vs the 4.125 bore on the 117".
Thanks guys.
I have a 103"er now with a set of SE 110" heads that were massaged on by WFO Larry...bronze guides, .030 milled, CNC ported, performance valve job, and AV&V .650 lift beehives. They flow 310 @ 28* @ .600 lift. I'm running Tman 625 cams with S&S roller rockers in SE forged rocker arm supports. SE 58mm T/B with 5.3 injectors. HQ Black Op's lifters, Baisley spring, SE 10.5:1 domed pistons, Boarzilla exhaust, and TTS tuned. Stout running little 103"er...it runs right next to my friends 120R until we hit 4th gear, then he finally stops spinning and hooks up...then he pulls me. :-(
I've been looking hard at the new S&S 117" cylinders coming out this month in the 4.125 bore. I had decided on sending my bottom end to either Tman or Darkhorse and having them work their magic with H-Beam rods and a Timkens upgrade, etc. Coin toss on them...both do great work, I just have to decide on what size I what to go.
Steve @ GMR threw some nice figures at me day before yesterday on doing a 120"er with a new SE 4 5/8 stroker crank and a 4.060 HD cylinders with his new 11.0:1 piston he designed for matching the SE head chambers ...which I plan on re-using my heads.
The money is about the same (3K) for a 117 vs 120 vs 124.
120" = 4 5/8 crank in a 4.060 case bore
117" = 4 3/8 crank in a 4.125 case bore
124" = 4 3/8 crank in a 4.250 bore...scary thin bore to me
I plan on re-using most of the above mentioned parts in my up coming build...with maybe a different cam choice...but those 625's are as quiet as stock, and pull hard. I had the Wood 408-6's in it in the beginning and could not get rid of the little man with the sledge hammer to go away, no matter what I tried.
What do you's think?