There was a review of Red Wing boots in a magazine a couple of months ago, and how they worked well as bike boots and for walking around. Does anybody know which model they are, or which mag/month the article was in? Thanks.
fxdx99 said:There was a review of Red Wing boots in a magazine a couple of months ago, and how they worked well as bike boots and for walking around. Does anybody know which model they are, or which mag/month the article was in? Thanks.
Friend of mine had a pair of boots with steel toes, hated 'em, put 'em in the closet for about 2 years. (I guess he didn't need them for work anymore). He finally called a shoe repair shop, asked if anything could be done about it. $10, he removed the steel toes, now he loves the darn things.casaba said:For what its worth. I have two pair of redwing, the first pair are 7 years old and feel as good as the day I bought them but need new soles. The second pair has the composite toe for safety and I HATE them. I have them for Hazmat work and put the zipper kit in. They wear badly against my little toe and I also had arch support issues. I used a pair of the half length gel inserts to fix the arch but toes still hurt. I use them to ride a good bit but tough on the feet after a long day. These are the ones that look like jump boots...overall I do like redwings and would recommend them without the hard toe
This is an old thread. the original post asking which magazine, was from 2003nimrod said:the mag. was the july 2004 issue of american iron, and the boots were the engineer boot. style # 968. I have those boots and love them. The only complaint I have with them is as the artical stated They make your white socks black. I went out and bought black socks just for the boots. Also the boots are union made in america. can't go wrong.