I personally would stay away from the 203's. I had them for a while and man it was ping city. I understand the 204 is a much better cam. Mike
You musta talked to the village idiot. Your right about gettin another opinion, the 26 is a great cam for 95" baggers.Dyna_mite said:The tech support person I spoke with said to use the 26G only with 88". For 95" motor he said to use the 37G. I emphasized that this was going in a bagger and I was interested in low end torque but he was adamant about not using the 26G with the big bore. I'm going to try again tomorrow to see if I get a different person / different advice.
I called Andrews today and talked with their main tech support person. He confirmed that the 26G was a good choice for low end torque in a 95" motor. The 37G will generate more HP but will have less torque at low RPM. He just dyno'd a carbureted FLHT with 26G, big bore, cast flat tops, minor head work (stock valves, radiused seats), 2 into 1 exhaust. He got 80 ft lbs @ 2000, 106 ft lbs @ 3000, and 94 HP @ 5300.I'm planning to install big bore kit and new cam. I planned to go with the 26G but called Andrews today just to confirm that was a reasonable choice. The tech support person I spoke with said to use the 26G only with 88". For 95" motor he said to use the 37G. I emphasized that this was going in a bagger and I was interested in low end torque but he was adamant about not using the 26G with the big bore. I'm going to try again tomorrow to see if I get a different person / different advice.
One of my riding buddies just did this build 95" on his 06 Street Glide:harleymike77 said:I’m looking at the HD 95" Big Bore kit, and am thinking about the following:
Screamin Eagle 1550cc (95 ci) Big Bore Kit including:
Screamin Eagle Cylinders
Screamin Eagle Pistons (Flat top – high performance)
Screamin Eagle clips and rings
Screamin Eagle air cleaner and breather hardware (already installed)
High performance clutch spring
Re-flash the ECM
Power Commander III USB
I will not be doing any headwork.
(I just added this - how about the SE204 cam & a SERT as opposed to above cams and the PC III?)
Here is my question - Which cam would you recommend: I am considering the Andrews 37G, or the Screamin Eagle 203 cam.
Thanks very much in advance for your time, I truly appreciate it. RIDE SAFE.
Mike
Dyna_mite said:I called Andrews today and talked with their main tech support person. He confirmed that the 26G was a good choice for low end torque in a 95" motor. The 37G will generate more HP but will have less torque at low RPM. He just dyno'd a carbureted FLHT with 26G, big bore, cast flat tops, minor head work (stock valves, radiused seats), 2 into 1 exhaust. He got 80 ft lbs @ 2000, 106 ft lbs @ 3000, and 94 HP @ 5300.
One other important piece of advice from Andrews tech support: CHECK PINION RUNOUT BEFORE ORDERING A GEAR DRIVE CAM. If you install a gear drive cam in a motor with more than 0.002" runout, something will break! According to 02 FLHT HD service manual, allowable crankshaft runout on new engine is 0.003". To check runout, remove pinion sprocket and set up dial indicator on crankshaft where pinion gear will mount. Turn engine over by hand (5th gear) and read min. / max. deflection on dial indicator.
harleymike77 said:Package #2 Mid Torque
Approximately 90* hp and 95* ft-lb torque
Heads Stock, Stage 2 "HammerHeads"
Cylinders Bored Stock -or- SE 1550 Conversion
Pistons SE or Keith Black 95" Flat Top 9.25:1
Cams Andrews TW26G + Gear-drive kit
Air Cleaner SE
EFI = stock throttle body, ported
EFI = Tunable System
Clutch # Stock -or- Extra-Plate Kit
Exhaust # V&H -or- Cycle Shack slip-on mufflers,
V&H Pro-Pipe -or- Thunderheader 2-1
Any thoughts out there about this build?? What about adding a Thunder Monster baffle?
Thanks in advance for your time. I appreciate it.