Joined
·
33 Posts
Like the looks of the Heritage ST - so whats the disadvantage of using it for 2 up riding?
On the softail, the passenger seat position is slightly elevated relative to the rider, and therefore more exposed to wind passing over the rider, whereas the position is relatively lower and more behind the rider on a touring model, and therefore somewhat protected from wind and buffeting. My wife, who has many miles as a passenger on both, reports the touring bikes to be more comfortable.John Deppong said:Like the looks of the Heritage ST - so whats the disadvantage of using it for 2 up riding?
There are more than a few that would disagree...I'll corner with anyone out there, (lower center of gravity and better road feel) got a buddy that put leather RK bags on his Fatty, (they look great) and any suspension can be upgraded though I like mine. (so does my wife)LittleBear said:Disadvantages:
1. Suspension is not as good as a Touring bike
2. Saddlebags do not hold as much
3. Does not corner as well as a Touring bike
That said, I toured 2 up on mine for 8 years before I got a EG.
Advantages,
1. Looks cool
2. Sits lower, great for short people like me.
3. A little lighter, easier to pick up if you drop it.
And it looks cool
If your main purpose is to have a bike for two up touring, get the touring platform, RK, or EG. Much better at it and more confortable.
swmnkdinthervr said:There are more than a few that would disagree...I'll corner with anyone out there, (lower center of gravity and better road feel) got a buddy that put leather RK bags on his Fatty, (they look great) and any suspension can be upgraded though I like mine. (so does my wife)
It's just a matter of taste...or lack of :laugh:
LOLratt said:......all you have to do ,, is skip all the screamin ego stuff and chrome do dads......My personal theory is ,, if it doesnt add more storage to the bike or more comfort for the rider ,, you dont need it ,, chrome dont get you home and noise is fatigue......keep em stock and spend your money on hotels and trips.....the full on touring bikes are the best handling and riding bikes harley makes.. rat
You are spot on with your reply. I have a Heritage and often ride a friend'sLittleBear said:Well for all you boys that think a Heritage corners better, the lean angle for the EG and RK are 2* more than a Hertage.
30/31 vs. 28/29
Given that fact alone, with two equally skilled riders, the touring bike can go around corners faster. Its a lot easier to scrap the floorboards on a Heritage than on a EG because it does it sooner, but still easy to do on an EG.
I have chased RK's through the twisties on my Heritage and with us both throwing sparks in every corner, the RK will pull away.
And I still like the Heritage.
But it comes down to an individuals own preference.
Both can be a 2 up touring bike, and owning both and having done it on both, the touring platform is more comfortable IMHO.
LittleBear said:Well for all you boys that think a Heritage corners better, the lean angle for the EG and RK are 2* more than a Hertage.
30/31 vs. 28/29
Given that fact alone, with two equally skilled riders, the touring bike can go around corners faster. Its a lot easier to scrap the floorboards on a Heritage than on a EG because it does it sooner, but still easy to do on an EG.
I have chased RK's through the twisties on my Heritage and with us both throwing sparks in every corner, the RK will pull away.
And I still like the Heritage.
But it comes down to an individuals own preference.
Both can be a 2 up touring bike, and owning both and having done it on both, the touring platform is more comfortable IMHO.
There's no disadvantage riding 2 up on a Heritage. Take one for a test ride, and also try out a Touring model. Take the Lady with you on the test ride so you both can make an educated decision. They're just two toatally different bikes that each have their strong points and their weak points. Good luck with your choice, and safe riding!!!Like the looks of the Heritage ST - so whats the disadvantage of using it for 2 up riding?