V-Twin Forum banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I'm looking at the parts list for my engine build that was done by the previous owner.

2005 Ultra Classic
570G Cam Kit W/4 Gears, part #DS20072570
1550 Piston Kit, Flat Top, part #22851-99A
Cylinder Head Kit, part # 16952-99C
Reed Valve Assembly, part # SS31-2071
Quick Install Pushrod Kit, part #17997-99A
Screaming Eagle Slip-on Mufflers
Air Cleaner appears to be stock
Power Commander, part # DS10200001

Am I correct that this engine is now just under 95 cubic inches? Approximately what hp and torque should this engine deliver?
Would I see a noticeable difference with a different air cleaner?
 

·
Ironbutt
Joined
·
7,415 Posts
I'm looking at the parts list for my engine build that was done by the previous owner.

2005 Ultra Classic
570G Cam Kit W/4 Gears, part #DS20072570
1550 Piston Kit, Flat Top, part #22851-99A
Cylinder Head Kit, part # 16952-99C
Reed Valve Assembly, part # SS31-2071
Quick Install Pushrod Kit, part #17997-99A
Screaming Eagle Slip-on Mufflers
Air Cleaner appears to be stock
Power Commander, part # DS10200001

Am I correct that this engine is now just under 95 cubic inches? Approximately what hp and torque should this engine deliver?
Would I see a noticeable difference with a different air cleaner?
Yes, 1550cc = 95 CI. The HP/TQ #s should be around 80/90... depending a lot on the tune. It would be VERY unusual for someone to change all that and leave the AC stock. It probably just looks stock from the outside and has a high flow filter inside the stock cover.
 

·
Premium octane member
Joined
·
7,381 Posts
Looks like a Hippo build variaton.
With a good set of pipes and a/c might touch 100/100 with a great tune. Less with a stock a/c and se slip ons.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
61 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
I was thinking the same about the air cleaner. I don't see any brand name or numbers on the filter element. Also wondering why he would spend all that money and only go to 95 ci. The previous owner told me it was 103 ci, but that can't be correct unless these pistons are shorter than the original ones. But even so, this engine runs very strong so I'm not complaining.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top