Okay--Several months ago I posted a thread about this guy that bought my old '79 Ironhead and was suing me for $5086 (he only paid $3500 for the bike) because he claims I lied about work performed on the bike. I won't get too much into that issue again, but wanted to let y'all know the judgement.
Basics of the case: He said the bike was not rebuilt (Pistons/Rings/Cylinders) as I told him it was and sued for deceptive trade practices...a bunch of BS! I had all the receipts etc.. and this is what happened in court today...
He said he has spent $558 on parts to get the bike in running condition and the judge ordered for me to pay half of that amount...even though I showed all the receipts to prove that I had the work performed. So here I am...owing this jack-ass $279 and feeling pretty pissed off about it. I want to know if I should APPEAL this decision. I don't feel like I owe him a freaking dime! Is it better to just pay the money and get this to go away, or is it worth it to file an appeal?
Basics of the case: He said the bike was not rebuilt (Pistons/Rings/Cylinders) as I told him it was and sued for deceptive trade practices...a bunch of BS! I had all the receipts etc.. and this is what happened in court today...
He said he has spent $558 on parts to get the bike in running condition and the judge ordered for me to pay half of that amount...even though I showed all the receipts to prove that I had the work performed. So here I am...owing this jack-ass $279 and feeling pretty pissed off about it. I want to know if I should APPEAL this decision. I don't feel like I owe him a freaking dime! Is it better to just pay the money and get this to go away, or is it worth it to file an appeal?