» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
» Buyers Guide |
|
|
» Links |
|
|
|
 |
|
02-29-2004, 09:26 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 761
|
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon
I am quick to get sucked into bullsh!t but ........... Last night I saw an interview on technotv that stirred my curiosity. The interviewee was presenting evidence that we never even went to the moon, it was was all a hoax by the CIA to fool the Russians into believing we had strategic advantages that they could never match (I think it worked). There is a web site called www.moonmovie.com that offers the apparent evidence. I am going to keep checking this out until I feel I can make a rational decision. What have you all heard regarding this?
Last edited by pierce : 02-29-2004 at 05:28 PM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
02-29-2004, 09:38 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maine
Posts: 812
|
Yeah, and the pictures of Mars is just pictures of Arizona through a red filter.
Ohh yeah, and the nuclear bomb is a myth. and WWII never happened.
__________________
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 09:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: magnolia, texas
Posts: 442
|
I was thinking about this a while ago, and all they would have to do is point one of the telloscopes at the moon to see if they can find any of the stuff that was left, like the rover, bottom half of the luner lander, the flag etc. I would'nt think it would be too difficult.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 10:11 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maine
Posts: 812
|
The Top 15 Reasons Why No Man Has Ever Set Foot on the Moon
15. "Tricky Dick" Richard Nixon was president at the time. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes and scandal. Think about all of his potential antics that were not discovered.
14. A successful manned mission to the moon offered a wonderful pride-boosting distraction for the near revolt of the US citizens over 50,000 deaths in the Vietnam War.
13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven important milestones:
1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit…
2. First man in space…
3. First man to orbit the earth…
4. First woman in space…
5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft…
6. The first space walk…
7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing…
This put America at a perceived military disadvantage in missile technology during the very height of the Cold War.
12. Neil Armstrong, the first man to supposedly walk on the moon, refuses to give interviews to anyone on the subject. "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies." Collins also refuses to be interviewed. Aldrin, who granted an interview, threatened to sue us if we showed it to anyone. See streaming video: "Buzz says, "Buzz Off!"
11. Newly retouched photographs correct errors from previously released versions. Why would they be updating thirty-year-old pictures if they really went to the moon?
With Prop ID "C"
After: "C" Removed
10. Rediscovered lost footage shows the American flag blowing in the wind. The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, uncirculated, space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for earth's six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over. See streaming video: "Flag blowing in the wind."
9. Enlarged photographs underneath the lunar lander's 10,000 lb. thrust engine show the soil completely undisturbed. During ground tests there was grave concern for the vehicle falling into the hole the engine created as it descended. An oversight that they would have to keep consistent for all subsequent moon missions. They attributed it to the effect of no atmosphere (except for the flag blowing in the wind - see # 10!)
8. Rare, uncirculated photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight. Yet they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect. See our streaming video: "Photographic Analysis" for some eye opening examples.
7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind. See streaming video: "Radiation Belts."
6. The top portion of the lunar module which landed on the moon supposedly popped up off the moon with two astronauts aboard, entered lunar orbit 60 miles up, and docked with the command module in lunar orbit. To look at its design and think such could have actually occurred is absolutely ludicrous. The fuel tanks were nowhere near one-sixth the size of those on the space shuttle as one would expect to achieve lunar orbit.
5. The surface of the moon is a vacuum. The landing module would have been heated to 250 degrees on the light side where they landed. There is no way they could have rejected the heat for as long as 72 hours as they claim on some Apollo missions. How long do you think you could keep your car cool on a hot day running off battery power?
4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is absurd.
3. After the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin gave a press conference. When asked whether they remembered seeing any stars from the surface of the moon, Collins, who was supposedly in the command module the whole time, gave a wrong answer to a question he should not have been answering. The relevant portion of this clip is in my documentary; viewing it with an understanding of the circumstances makes it clear they were lying about having traveled to the moon. I'm saying Collins blew it right then and there and I honestly cannot understand why there is even further discussion on the whole topic. Furthermore, if you obtain a written transcript of the press conference you'll see that the comment is erroneously attributed to Aldrin. Honest mistake or cover-up?
2. In 1967 three astronauts were burned alive on the launch pad. The upshot of the congressional inquiry was that the entire Apollo program was in shambles and it was a miracle no one was killed sooner. All of the problems were supposedly fixed by 1969, just two years later. How could they have made such a large improvement in "quality control" in such a short period of time.
1. All Apollo missions stayed in low-earth orbit for the duration of the trip. We uncovered some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA that shows the crew of Apollo 11 clearly staging a shot of being half-way to the moon. This clip, shown in our documentary, proves they did not leave low-earth orbit. You won't see this anywhere else!
If they are so sure of themselves with this miniscule crap their arguing about, well why are they charging money for their documentary film?
And why do they not have an argument about other items such as the moon rocks that have been brought to Earth or the low gravity hopping on film or pictures of the lunar landscape with the Earth in the back ground, or the film of the capsule taking of from the lunar surface.
I say these idiots (which remind me of groups like PETA and Greenpeace) need to find a real job and quit suckering people out of their hard earned money over these totally circumstantial arguments
__________________
It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 11:52 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kingsley, Michigan
Posts: 733
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
15. "Tricky Dick" Richard Nixon was president at the time. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes and scandal. Think about all of his potential antics that were not discovered.
|
Oh yeh... The Apollo program had been up and running for two years by the time Nixon came into office, and he had a whole six months to divise this evil plan and put it into operation. Good arugment here...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven important milestones:
1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit…
2. First man in space…
3. First man to orbit the earth…
4. First woman in space…
5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft…
6. The first space walk…
7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing…
|
#7 is wrong. We were first in that operation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
12. Neil Armstrong, the first man to supposedly walk on the moon, refuses to give interviews to anyone on the subject. "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies." Collins also refuses to be interviewed. Aldrin, who granted an interview, threatened to sue us if we showed it to anyone. See streaming video: "Buzz says, "Buzz Off!"
|
Gee, I wonder why. I've seen Buzz on many interviews over the years, and Collins on at least one. Armstrong has decided to remain in relative hiding, though I did see him on an appearance recently. He even spoke, but unfortunately I forget what the event was.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
|
Just as likely, one of you high school edumacated PhotoChoppers doctored the original. Also, just when and where were these "new" pictures "released"?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
10. Rediscovered lost footage shows the American flag blowing in the wind. The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, uncirculated, space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for earth's six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over. See streaming video: "Flag blowing in the wind."
http://www.moonmovie.com/images/topten4.jpg
|
Hmmmmm... Seems to be the same picture I remember seeing as a kid. This is a cloth flag, with very little friction keeping it from flapping, and even less gravity. How do you expect it to act? I would think a wave effect from any movement and inertia would keep the flag moving for quite a while. Oh, and the crappy video you provide is looped. Need help making your point...?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
9. Enlarged photographs underneath the lunar lander's 10,000 lb. thrust engine show the soil completely undisturbed.
|
Looks disturbed to me. But again, your pictures suck too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
8. Rare, uncirculated photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight. Yet they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect. See our streaming video: "Photographic Analysis" for some eye opening examples.
|
Dummass. Geezz I hate these people. Okay, if the sun is high in the sky, you'll get a distorted perspective of where the "vanishing point" is of parallel lines. In fact shadows will NOT run parallel, but diverge as they get farther from the source.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind. See streaming video: "Radiation Belts."
|
Maybe Apollo was DESIGNED to go beyond 400 miles? What's your point, and no, I'm not watching another of your crappy videos.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
6. The top portion of the lunar module which landed on the moon supposedly popped up off the moon with two astronauts aboard, entered lunar orbit 60 miles up, and docked with the command module in lunar orbit. To look at its design and think such could have actually occurred is absolutely ludicrous. The fuel tanks were nowhere near one-sixth the size of those on the space shuttle as one would expect to achieve lunar orbit.
|
Damn, you is a smart focker, ain't ya? Space Shuttle = BIG MO FO. Lander = Little S.O.B. 1/6th it's own weight. And how far does it have to go, with no friction mind you, to break free of gravity? Come on Mr. Rocket Scientist, is that your final answer?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
5. The surface of the moon is a vacuum. The landing module would have been heated to 250 degrees on the light side where they landed. There is no way they could have rejected the heat for as long as 72 hours as they claim on some Apollo missions. How long do you think you could keep your car cool on a hot day running off battery power?
|
Duh! Oh yeh, they landed in a 1969 Chevy. You're RIGHT! http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/foru...lies/smack.gif
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is absurd.
|
It it NOT cylindrical, and I would just guess, though I can't prove it, that General Dynamics had some smarter people working on the LEM than you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
3. After the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin gave a press conference. When asked whether they remembered seeing any stars from the surface of the moon, Collins, who was supposedly in the command module the whole time, gave a wrong answer to a question he should not have been answering. The relevant portion of this clip is in my documentary; viewing it with an understanding of the circumstances makes it clear they were lying about having traveled to the moon. I'm saying Collins blew it right then and there and I honestly cannot understand why there is even further discussion on the whole topic. Furthermore, if you obtain a written transcript of the press conference you'll see that the comment is erroneously attributed to Aldrin. Honest mistake or cover-up?
|
Well, without the evidence at hand I can't comment, but judging from the rest of your argument, I'd have to say it's crap too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
2. In 1967 three astronauts were burned alive on the launch pad. The upshot of the congressional inquiry was that the entire Apollo program was in shambles and it was a miracle no one was killed sooner. All of the problems were supposedly fixed by 1969, just two years later. How could they have made such a large improvement in "quality control" in such a short period of time.
|
Ummmm, they redesigned the capsule to not have a pure oxygen atmosphere, eliminated many potential electical weak points, hard work, long hours, many working real jobs and not trying to fake a moon landing...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Givemefuel
1. All Apollo missions stayed in low-earth orbit for the duration of the trip. We uncovered some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA that shows the crew of Apollo 11 clearly staging a shot of being half-way to the moon. This clip, shown in our documentary, proves they did not leave low-earth orbit. You won't see this anywhere else!
|
Except maybe the comedy channel?
http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/foru...es/nutkick.gif
Last edited by alleydude : 02-29-2004 at 11:54 AM.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: alabama
Posts: 936
|
Good reply alleydude. I was just going to site the obviously retouched photo of the 'prop'. The c appears to be written on the film, not the rock. And the photo without the c is blurry like in cheap editing software.
I think the site is a hoax.
__________________
1994 Electraglide
If you have to say you are....you ain't!
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:37 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kingsley, Michigan
Posts: 733
|
Quote:
|
Gee, I wonder why. I've seen Buzz on many interviews over the years, and Collins on at least one. Armstrong has decided to remain in relative hiding, though I did see him on an appearance recently. He even spoke, but unfortunately I forget what the event was.
|
Just remembered where I saw Neil Armstrong appear. It was at the 100th anniversary of the Wright Brother's first powered flight. He did an interview, and spoke a few words about walking on the moon. Not a lot, but just a bit on how it related to the Wright Brothers. So he wants to remain private... that's his business.
And thanks, Mojo... 
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 761
|
Why havn't we been back there for so long? The radiation belt is interesting. I heard Bush talikng about it the other day. It was in the context that he was trying to sell us a new propgram that will put a possible manned space station on the moon that would serve as a stop on the way to Mars. He referred to the fact that we will have to deal with the radiation belt. Why would it be such a big deal if we have been there already? Right when all else is failing for the President it's funny he should start talking about going to the moon. Reminds me of another President we had back in late 60's and early 70's. All I'm saying is that I wouldn't doubt it. Maybe we will find Iraq's nukes up there.
I agree Givemefuel, it appears the film guy is trying to cash in on the deal.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 06:36 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kingsley, Michigan
Posts: 733
|
The primary reason we haven't been back is because it's so FREAKING expensive, and by the time Apollo 17 came around (there were more scheduled), America had lost interest. The fuel crisis was kicking into full swing, and we had a lot of other worries. The money just went away.
The Space Shuttle came about as a cost effective way to launch stuff, and though it is a bit more conservitive than Apollo, it was still very expensive. I think it's silly that they are talking about going to the moon again, when there are so many other intellegent ways to spend that kind of money here on Earth. I've always been a major fan and supporter of the Space Program (could you tell), but even I don't see the need to spend that kind of money again, not in this day and age.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 08:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,928
|
The truth is hidden in Roswell, NM............

__________________
No, I will not fix your computer.
GO NOLES!!!!!
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 08:21 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
ROCK BOTTOM AND DIGGING
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 324
|
Lets see....This is the Art Bell crowd (and ever Art Bell believes we went to the moon) again and thier wooo wooo ideas.
1) We did not go to the moon
2) Aleins are among us
3) Big Foot lives next door (and other Cryptozological Critters)
4) Area 51 houses the Green Space Men
5) Elvis is alive and works as a gas station attendant in Arizona
6) John F. Kennedy lived on a boat in the Mediterainan after the Assasination Attempt
7) Lee Harvey Oswald was a stooge (Maybe)
8) My Dead Grandma talks to me, hell she did not even talk to me when I was alive.
9) Dinosaurs did not exist
10) The Trilateral Commission is plotting to take over the world. Hell we all would do that, if we could
11) Are is a face on Mars built by ancient aliens
Sometime what you see and hear is real and sometimes what you what you cannot is not.
ONCE AND FOR ALL, WE LANDED ON THE MOON. WE ARE THE GREATEST SOCIETY AND THE MOST TECHNOLOGICLY ADVANCED EVER ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 09:20 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 109
|
Ya know there is a hand place reflector on the moon that we use all the time to mesure the distance from the earth to the moon, it really would be hard to "Throw" that thing up there?
Click here to be convinced
__________________
Thump, thump, thump...Is this thing on?
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 09:30 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kingsley, Michigan
Posts: 733
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FXRocket
Ya know there is a hand place reflector on the moon that we use all the time to mesure the distance from the earth to the moon, it really would be hard to "Throw" that thing up there?
|
Oh, now you've gone and blown the WHOLE conspiracy theory! http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 12:08 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 761
|
Thanks for the replies!
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 08:27 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
|
The wife and I say a tv documentary on one of the network stations a couple years ago. about this very thing. After watching the show there was no doubt in my mind or the wifes that we in fact did not go to the moon.
They even interviewed a Russian cosmonoght I know the spelling is wrong, and he said the reason the Russians never went to the moon was because it was common knowledge that the radiation belt between the earth and moon would not allow a human to survive, especially with the flimsy tim foil suits of those days.
When asked what the surface of the moon was like it was described as a top layer of dust like talcum powder.
Funny how when you watch the lunar lander approaching landing with its thrusters blasting there is very little dust and in fact you can see the ground and rocks around the landing site with absolutly no problem. Seem funny to me that this could happen when a sand storm in Saudi Arabia can make it difficult to see your hand in front of your face. If you don't believe that look at the pictures of the lunar lander sitting on the moons surface cleaner than a Harley in the showroom. Take a close look at the leg pads of the lander. They're cleaner than the shiniest piece of chrome on your bike.
There were too many discrepancies on the show to list. I hope it airs again so those that missed it the first time can watch it. It is an eye opener
Some may still believe we landed on the moon I do not. I feel we were all duped just to get our minds off of other things going on at the time. 
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|