» Sponsors
ArnottAirRideMotorcycle.comPowersportModels.comBikeBanditStoneyStraps.comRosa's CycleKomodoGear.comPerformanceOilTechKewlMetal.com

» Sponsors
Go Back   V-Twin Forum : Harley Davidson Motorcycle Forums > V-Twin Performance Forums > V-Twin: Engine Mods

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2008, 05:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium
 
firehog383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
firehog383 is on a distinguished road
Whats the difference in Head CC's

If I have 10.5-1 compression with 83 cc heads, or 10.5-1 compression with 76 cc heads, whats the difference going to be. Will I get more power or torque with the smaller combustion chamber or the larger one?
firehog383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 05-17-2008, 05:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
IronButt
 
DEW2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit, Mi
Posts: 371
DEW2112 is on a distinguished road
The one that gets better volumetric efficiency! Google that one and figure it out.
__________________
1982 SHOVEL - 96"
2002 FLHT STD
95" - 9.8:1 Comp
Wiseco Flattop Pistons w/ thermal barrier coating
Dewey's Pro Street Heads
Andrews 37G
Mikuni 42 Carb
Zippers adj. Ignition
LSR 2-1
DEW2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
IronButt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 100
Kivaari is on a distinguished road
cc volume

More information please
Kivaari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
IronButt
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 568
Mo-Dog is on a distinguished road
Wouldn't you have more overall ci displacement (with everything else being equal ) if you get the same compression with more volume in your heads? Sounds like the 83cc head motor would be bigger...

Quote:
Originally Posted by firehog383 View Post
If I have 10.5-1 compression with 83 cc heads, or 10.5-1 compression with 76 cc heads, whats the difference going to be. Will I get more power or torque with the smaller combustion chamber or the larger one?
__________________
"You are only young once but you can stay immature forever"
05' FLHRCI - Black Cherry Pearl - 117" GMR build...125/125 SAE...
...
Mo-Dog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Doofhead
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: da' burbs where it's windy
Posts: 3,533
Totenkopf is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mo-Dog View Post
Wouldn't you have more overall ci displacement (with everything else being equal ) if you get the same compression with more volume in your heads? Sounds like the 83cc head motor would be bigger...
DING! DING! DING! DING!

we have a winner!!
__________________
'05 FLSTCI - Cobalt Blue w/ Candy Flames [custom paint by VonRaknid]
Chubby WO515 Bars - 18" Fat Daddy 50's w/ ME880's - GMA Brakes - Baker DD6 - 95" w/ SE Cast Flat Tops - Street Ported Heads 9.9:1 CR - [Engines by Otto] - Andrews 37G - 1.675:1 Rockers - Dakota Kid Delphi TB/Intake - SERT tuned by Otto - RB Racing LSR 2:1 - 96hp/106tq
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 06:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
IronButt
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alabama
Posts: 5,124
claydbal is on a distinguished road
firehog, the cc relates to a particular build, you dont just bolt on a certain cc head.
claydbal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 07:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium
 
firehog383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
firehog383 is on a distinguished road
Lets say I'm going to build a 103ci engine for a bagger. I'm looking for torque from 2000 rpm up SE HTCC heads are 83cc combustion chambers with HTCC pistons 10.5-1 compression, SE pro heads are 76cc combustion chambers at 10.5-1 compression. Using the same cam, TW-6. I know what heads flow more, are the larger heads with the bigger chambers better in the high rpm range. I hope I explained this right.
firehog383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 07:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Iron Butt, SS2000
 
jerry34208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,298
jerry34208 is on a distinguished road
The heads with the bigger combustion chamber will need domed pistons to get the compression to be the same as smaller heads.
While one of those combinations is gonna win out over the other, which one is best at a given RPM is not directly related to the size of the combustion chamber.
__________________
'04 Ultra built & tuned by Doc, HDMD88 Tuning Center
Results: http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/k.../Build/SAE.jpg
jerry34208 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
Doofhead
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: da' burbs where it's windy
Posts: 3,533
Totenkopf is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by firehog383 View Post
Lets say I'm going to build a 103ci engine for a bagger. I'm looking for torque from 2000 rpm up SE HTCC heads are 83cc combustion chambers with HTCC pistons 10.5-1 compression, SE pro heads are 76cc combustion chambers at 10.5-1 compression. Using the same cam, TW-6. I know what heads flow more, are the larger heads with the bigger chambers better in the high rpm range. I hope I explained this right.
If you want torque everywhere.... increase your displacement and step on the compression. Then, let a Pro figure out the heads, along with the cam, pipes and intake for your mission.
__________________
'05 FLSTCI - Cobalt Blue w/ Candy Flames [custom paint by VonRaknid]
Chubby WO515 Bars - 18" Fat Daddy 50's w/ ME880's - GMA Brakes - Baker DD6 - 95" w/ SE Cast Flat Tops - Street Ported Heads 9.9:1 CR - [Engines by Otto] - Andrews 37G - 1.675:1 Rockers - Dakota Kid Delphi TB/Intake - SERT tuned by Otto - RB Racing LSR 2:1 - 96hp/106tq
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium
 
firehog383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
firehog383 is on a distinguished road
Cubic inches are what they are and is independant of the combustion chamber. Displacement is determined by the swept volume of the bore and stroke. I don't see how the combustion chamber size would alter that. Maybe someone could explain this better. I'm getting ready to build my engine and was curious as to the combustion chamber size and torque.
firehog383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Help! I can't breathe!
 
wfolarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oak Lawn, IL.
Posts: 171
wfolarry is on a distinguished road
If you can get the desired compression with a flat top piston this is the preferred way IMO. In your example given a choice I would rather have the smaller chamber.
__________________

I actually measure cams.
Flowbenches are like dynos. Some guys just want to see the #'s while others use them for tuning.
All posts based on experience not what I found googling.
wfolarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
Doofhead
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: da' burbs where it's windy
Posts: 3,533
Totenkopf is on a distinguished road
The cam choice dictates the compression. The chamber volume is dictated by the compression, relative to the displacement. There are variations of trading dome or dish volume for chamber volume but in the end, it has to be set to a net cc's to achieve the desired compression.

I agree with Larry, for a reasonable street motor, a flat top piston is hard to beat with a small-ish chamber. The problem is, with the 76cc chamber and the Wood TW6, your compression would be over 11:1 and the ccp is 217 psi. Why not use your stock heads and have them modified to work? Roughly 85-86cc is what you need for that cam.
__________________
'05 FLSTCI - Cobalt Blue w/ Candy Flames [custom paint by VonRaknid]
Chubby WO515 Bars - 18" Fat Daddy 50's w/ ME880's - GMA Brakes - Baker DD6 - 95" w/ SE Cast Flat Tops - Street Ported Heads 9.9:1 CR - [Engines by Otto] - Andrews 37G - 1.675:1 Rockers - Dakota Kid Delphi TB/Intake - SERT tuned by Otto - RB Racing LSR 2:1 - 96hp/106tq
Totenkopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium
 
firehog383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
firehog383 is on a distinguished road
Would the TW-5 have more compression or less .575 lift 234 duration. Thanks for your help.
firehog383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
Lifetime Premium
 
firehog383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 49
firehog383 is on a distinguished road
I already have a set of S/E heads that have been cleaned up a little, and a set of woods TW-5 chain driven cams that are bolt in for theese heads roller rockers and S/E support plates, stroker flat top pistons that are 10.5 static for the heads. I got a deal on the heads and had a local head porter clean them up. Will this work or am I better off starting over.
firehog383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 10:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
Seasoned Rider
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bow, Wa.
Posts: 42
joelp34252 is on a distinguished road
I run a 103 with woods 6h cams in a bagger that is very strong. Flat top pistons and 210 lbs compression. You need to make sure to have a good exhaust and good ignition with a good tune though with high compression.
Joel 2001 FLHT
joelp34252 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Harley Davidson Suzuki GSXR Honda 600RR Yamaha R6
Sportbike Forums GSXR Forum Honda 1000RR Yamaha R1
Sportbikes Forum Ducati Forum Kawasaki ZX R6 Forum
Motorcycle Forum Ducati Monster Kawasaki Forum R1 MessageNet

(C)2001- V-twinForum.com All Rights Reserved

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0