I would like to point something, amount of material removed has nothing to do with perfromance.
Here are a few guide lines to follow when porting heads
1. Flow loss'e arise from change in directions and decrease's in velocity( like port bends ans exspansion)
2. Port are should be iun the range 05 65%-100% of valve area
3.Remove material from outside of port bends not the inside. THis will allow increase and improved flow by increasing the radius of the bend.
4. Port legnth and finish are not very important( flow bench will prove this)
5.One of the greatest losses in flow in the intake port is due to exspansion of the air out of the valve. So with that in mind the critical areas are just before the valve and just after valve extremly important.
6. the valve seat shape plays a big part in flow.
SO does anyone have the if flow losses are cause by port expansion not contractions in the port and seat area???
Ok the reason being is that the air must make a 90* turn and expand as it flow out of the valve and into the cylinder. A term called "humping" the port inward just below the seat allows the air to make a much more gradual turn into the valve edge.there fore reducing the total flow losses.
Again not trying to start any issues only pointing out facts. This is not a post to oint out that any one listed is not a good porter. I have been doing heads both 2 (jugs) and 4 stroke for several years. AS many of you know and have used my street port heads with great results. The stock head is not a bad design for mild set ups. I would have to say that the stock springs should be up graded as with most upgrade the riders then starts ride the bike harder power byproduct I guess.
