San Francisco - Wiener doesn't want to see weiners

[Jeffytune]

Originally Posted by Michael Psycle

Let the circus of responses begin.

Okay, since you asked so nicely I think he should run for president on the dems ticket in 2016.
He could ask the current Attorney general Eric Holder.

Yes, the Wiener/Holder ticket.

[Markk9]

Some of you people are really bad parents!!!! If you believe that a child seeing naked person will be traumatized, you are a nut job. There is nothing wrong with nudity. I wouldn't want my kids to watch people having sex, but naked, no problem.

[HDSickness]

Originally Posted by Markk9

Some of you people are really bad parents!!!! If you believe that a child seeing naked person will be traumatized, you are a nut job. There is nothing wrong with nudity. I wouldn't want my kids to watch people having sex, but naked, no problem.

Really? Bad parents not wanting our children to see the pervs sitting around nude? These freeks have their junk cut, mutilated and pierced.
Explain that to your child.
And as far as personal freedoms go, why is this ok but not the freedom to smoke in public or use plastic bags? What about those personal freedoms that have been taken away in SF?

[BOUTYM]

Originally Posted by Michael Psycle

You're in that same group with HDSickness.

Count me as a member of the group also!

[Markk9]

Originally Posted by HDSickness

Really? Bad parents not wanting our children to see the pervs sitting around nude? These freeks have their junk cut, mutilated and pierced.
Explain that to your child.
And as far as personal freedoms go, why is this ok but not the freedom to smoke in public or use plastic bags? What about those personal freedoms that have been taken away in SF?

So, does this mean you don't know how to talk to your kids about subjects you don't like.

[HDSickness]

Originally Posted by Markk9

So, does this mean you don't know how to talk to your kids about subjects you don't like.

There are certain things children should not be exposed to.
Trying to explain why a man would sit around exposing his junk to everyone including small children is difficult to explain, but not beyond my capabilities.
Must be the pedophile crowd who would think exposing ones self to small children is ok.

[James]

I can't even do this with the lights on.

[Michael Psycle]

Originally Posted by HDSickness

There are certain things children should not be exposed to.
Trying to explain why a man would sit around exposing his junk to everyone including small children is difficult to explain, but not beyond my capabilities.
Must be the pedophile crowd who would think exposing ones self to small children is ok.

That kind of thinking, believing that nudity equals pedophilia leaves children open to abuse by true pedophiles. Best you learn about pedophilia to protect your children.

[Hamilton]

Originally Posted by Markk9

Some of you people are really bad parents!!!!

I wouldn't want my kids to watch people having sex, but naked, no problem.

And there you have it : how to be a "great" parent by Markk9.

[thrasher]

Originally Posted by Lefty

This thread is proof of the fact that Kali has earned the title HDsickness stated as well as the pride some take in its obvious illustrations.

For me, reading some posts on this subject make me firmer in my opposition to the acceptance of all things gay.

X2!

Originally Posted by WEINERDOGBONE

I've been to SF six times. It is a lovely city. I have not observed any abhorent behavior while visiting there. I did see a dude all dressed up like a woman one time but, I've seen a few of those around here.

I do believe that all adults should keep their clothes on while out in public. I don't want to pile on here Michael but I think you're way off base on this issue.

I agree. Keep you nudity where it belongs: in privacy.

I enjoy taking my family to SF, but i damned sure dont want to see a bunch of neekid people running around... and i especially dont want my kids to see it. In America you have freedom to do what you want as long as it doesnt hurt others. Running around neekid in public certainly hurts others.

[Markk9]

What a bunch of prudes.........................I guess the pussification of harley-davidson riders is true.

[Markk9]

Originally Posted by HDSickness

There are certain things children should not be exposed to.
Trying to explain why a man would sit around exposing his junk to everyone including small children is difficult to explain, but not beyond my capabilities.
Must be the pedophile crowd who would think exposing ones self to small children is ok.

So you would rather they found about it with out your guidance. How do you plan to explain sex to your daughter or even son, then? Are you not going explain the good, bad, and ugly parts of sex?

[Hamilton]

Originally Posted by Markk9

What a bunch of prudes.........................I guess the pussification of harley-davidson riders is true.

Prudes?

Gee, no need to play hardball.

[Tequila SG]

Originally Posted by rgraham

These guys don't "have" children. Why should they care about what happens to your children? The fact this topic is even a discussion is disgusting.

You nailed it!!!!

[streetg]

Originally Posted by James

I can't even do this with the lights on.

You can in SF on a schoolbus, lights on or off, it's your choice.
This is really a ridiculous argument, and it has nothing to do with personal freedom. We all know there are pervs out there who get their jollies just exposing themselves, whether it's to kids order not, they will participate in Michael's exhibition of freedom for jollies, not personal expression
All of them? Nope, but just one doing this is a form of sexual assault.
The whole "I don't believe the govt should legislate morality " thing is a load of crap. It just depends on the morals. a bunch o pervs shakin junk is out of bounds to govt, yet it's fine to force me/us to provide cradle to grave support to people who don't even try on their own, why?? well it's morally wrong for some to have so much while others have so little. More BS liberal hypocrisy.