Benghazi-gate Where is the citizen outrage?

[Waffen]

There will never be answers because progressives really don't care about Americans, even their own murdered employees.


“Let’s put this behind us,” Kerry told one of several Republican members of the House Foreign Relations Committee who pressed him to personally investigate why the administration initially described the attack that killed four U.S. officials as a “spontaneous demonstration” that got out of hand.

“We’ve got serious, important, big current developments that we need to be debating” on a range of other issues, Kerry said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...f71_story.html


obama, his administration and hillary clinton are,,, damn I just don't have any words anymore.

W

[autoworker]

Originally Posted by Waffen

There will never be answers because progressives really don't care about Americans, even their own murdered employees.


“Let’s put this behind us,” Kerry told one of several Republican members of the House Foreign Relations Committee who pressed him to personally investigate why the administration initially described the attack that killed four U.S. officials as a “spontaneous demonstration” that got out of hand.

“We’ve got serious, important, big current developments that we need to be debating” on a range of other issues, Kerry said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...f71_story.html


obama, his administration and hillary clinton are,,, damn I just don't have any words anymore.

W

I have words....they're (the whole bunch)are NFG.

[webco2]

Originally Posted by Waffen

There will never be answers because progressives really don't care about Americans, even their own murdered employees.


“Let’s put this behind us,” Kerry told one of several Republican members of the House Foreign Relations Committee who pressed him to personally investigate why the administration initially described the attack that killed four U.S. officials as a “spontaneous demonstration” that got out of hand.

“We’ve got serious, important, big current developments that we need to be debating” on a range of other issues, Kerry said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...f71_story.html


obama, his administration and hillary clinton are,,, damn I just don't have any words anymore.

W

The hearings in congress are starting to get some answers now.

[Fred1369]

This is what puzzles me: we know that most of the MSM is liberal inclined and tends to give Barry a break. We also know that FOX hates Barry with a passion and for MONTHS they have done nothing but harp on the Bengahzi thing. If their take on this is any where near true why isn't the MSM at least looking into it? Even if they are fond of Obama I wouldn't think that the MSM would assist in a cover-up.

[Homesick]

Originally Posted by Fred1369

This is what puzzles me: we know that most of the MSM is liberal inclined and tends to give Barry a break. We also know that FOX hates Barry with a passion and for MONTHS they have done nothing but harp on the Bengahzi thing. If their take on this is any where near true why isn't the MSM at least looking into it? Even if they are fond of Obama I wouldn't think that the MSM would assist in a cover-up.

Far lefties are pack animals; like hyenas, not like burros. And I heard Friday that ABC news is finally starting to ask questions.

You need to use language for the leftist media's "fondness" for Barry that's as strong as your language for Fox's "hatred" for him.

Standard Fred, softballs for the left and hardballs for the right. Then, the innocent act.

joe

[RGRider]

Originally Posted by Fred1369

This is what puzzles me: we know that most of the MSM is liberal inclined and tends to give Barry a break. We also know that FOX hates Barry with a passion and for MONTHS they have done nothing but harp on the Bengahzi thing. If their take on this is any where near true why isn't the MSM at least looking into it? Even if they are fond of Obama I wouldn't think that the MSM would assist in a cover-up.

Consider this, the heads of ABC and CBS both have family who are top officials in the Oblammo administration.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/11/to...hazi-coverage/

[johnjzjz]

The Benghazi Scandal Grows )
Having lived through both, I find the comparisons to the Benghazi scandal and Watergate compelling. Also, very disturbing. A valid case can be made that, of the two, Benghazi was much worse than Watergate since four Americans died at Benghazi. The only thing that died as a result of Watergate was Richard Nixon's political career. Both involved powerful cover ups at the highest level of government, both for self serving political interests. Each received different handling from the American media.
Watergate was uncovered by the media and media used all it's anger, focus and energy to stir the national pot against the people, named and unnamed, involved in the Watergate plot. They created the groundswell of American anger that forced Richard Nixon out of office. However, Watergate was only disclosed after Nixon had won his landslide election victory in 1972.
The timing of Benghazi was such that had the truth of the incompetent mishandling of the action and the collusion to deceive the American public on the issue been made public promptly with the same energy by the media in September, 2012 as it had nearly forty years earlier, there's a very good chance that Obama could have lost the election nearly two months later. We'll never know, will we? It would take true naivete to believe that the timing of the Benghazi incident didn't factor largely into the reasons for the President's cover up. Fortunately for the President, he didn't have to explain to the American media. They were his willing co-conspirators.
Whatever sins of commission or omission surface from these Benghazi investigations, what is unmistakable is that the same media that used all its power and influence to persecute and prosecute Richard Nixon for Watergate is now using that influence to protect the guilty of the Benghazi incident. The mighty power of the Fourth Estate, the protector of the best interests of the American public, is now the willing lap dog of the sitting President and his other co-conspirators.
So a White House sponsored cover up that should have angry Americans marching in the streets for the impeachment of the President is now being portrayed openly by his loyal media and political spinmeisters as a witch hunt by Obama's political enemies conducted not for purposes of finding the truth or correcting an injustice, but for purely partisan reasons. Shortly, we'll be hearing that it's all a racist conspiracy by the GOP to slander the good name of the Black Savior. He's played that card so often, the spots should be worn off by now.
While the feckless hacks of the Keystone Kops Congress focus debate the status of the Second Amendment, it's clear to me that we should also be seriously considering the self evident fecklessness of the First Amendment. When the media protected by such provisions willingly devotes itself to promoting the lies and corruption of the President, it clearly has no current value.
If the American media had the same perspective forty years ago, Watergate would never have been a public issue, there would have been no subsequent "President Ford" and America might never have experienced the misfortune of "President" Jimmy Carter. One can only wonder, fearfully, what the current voluntary subservience to the White House by the American media will mean for the future of America.

[streetg]

Originally Posted by johnjzjz

The Benghazi Scandal Grows )
Having lived through both, I find the comparisons to the Benghazi scandal and Watergate compelling. Also, very disturbing. A valid case can be made that, of the two, Benghazi was much worse than Watergate since four Americans died at Benghazi. The only thing that died as a result of Watergate was Richard Nixon's political career. Both involved powerful cover ups at the highest level of government, both for self serving political interests. Each received different handling from the American media.
Watergate was uncovered by the media and media used all it's anger, focus and energy to stir the national pot against the people, named and unnamed, involved in the Watergate plot. They created the groundswell of American anger that forced Richard Nixon out of office. However, Watergate was only disclosed after Nixon had won his landslide election victory in 1972.
The timing of Benghazi was such that had the truth of the incompetent mishandling of the action and the collusion to deceive the American public on the issue been made public promptly with the same energy by the media in September, 2012 as it had nearly forty years earlier, there's a very good chance that Obama could have lost the election nearly two months later. We'll never know, will we? It would take true naivete to believe that the timing of the Benghazi incident didn't factor largely into the reasons for the President's cover up. Fortunately for the President, he didn't have to explain to the American media. They were his willing co-conspirators.
Whatever sins of commission or omission surface from these Benghazi investigations, what is unmistakable is that the same media that used all its power and influence to persecute and prosecute Richard Nixon for Watergate is now using that influence to protect the guilty of the Benghazi incident. The mighty power of the Fourth Estate, the protector of the best interests of the American public, is now the willing lap dog of the sitting President and his other co-conspirators.
So a White House sponsored cover up that should have angry Americans marching in the streets for the impeachment of the President is now being portrayed openly by his loyal media and political spinmeisters as a witch hunt by Obama's political enemies conducted not for purposes of finding the truth or correcting an injustice, but for purely partisan reasons. Shortly, we'll be hearing that it's all a racist conspiracy by the GOP to slander the good name of the Black Savior. He's played that card so often, the spots should be worn off by now.
While the feckless hacks of the Keystone Kops Congress focus debate the status of the Second Amendment, it's clear to me that we should also be seriously considering the self evident fecklessness of the First Amendment. When the media protected by such provisions willingly devotes itself to promoting the lies and corruption of the President, it clearly has no current value.
If the American media had the same perspective forty years ago, Watergate would never have been a public issue, there would have been no subsequent "President Ford" and America might never have experienced the misfortune of "President" Jimmy Carter. One can only wonder, fearfully, what the current voluntary subservience to the White House by the American media will mean for the future of America.

And our liberal friends here ??? Well, if you find any of this disgustingly corrupt your just a teabilly, a bigot, a racist..
Good job guys.....

[dproto]

The Obama administration is as crooked as a cork screw, They make Nixon and his bunch look like a bunch of choir boy's. Remember this occurred in the middle of a re-election campaign and I believe this whole cover up was engineered in Chicago by Obama's campaign manager that sleaze ball David Axelrod, including using Susan Rice as a sacrificial lamb.

[Homesick]

Originally Posted by johnjzjz

The Benghazi Scandal Grows )
Having lived through both, I find the comparisons to the Benghazi scandal and Watergate compelling. Also, very disturbing. A valid case can be made that, of the two, Benghazi was much worse than Watergate since four Americans died at Benghazi. The only thing that died as a result of Watergate was Richard Nixon's political career. Both involved powerful cover ups at the highest level of government, both for self serving political interests. Each received different handling from the American media.
Watergate was uncovered by the media and media used all it's anger, focus and energy to stir the national pot against the people, named and unnamed, involved in the Watergate plot. They created the groundswell of American anger that forced Richard Nixon out of office. However, Watergate was only disclosed after Nixon had won his landslide election victory in 1972.
The timing of Benghazi was such that had the truth of the incompetent mishandling of the action and the collusion to deceive the American public on the issue been made public promptly with the same energy by the media in September, 2012 as it had nearly forty years earlier, there's a very good chance that Obama could have lost the election nearly two months later. We'll never know, will we? It would take true naivete to believe that the timing of the Benghazi incident didn't factor largely into the reasons for the President's cover up. Fortunately for the President, he didn't have to explain to the American media. They were his willing co-conspirators.
Whatever sins of commission or omission surface from these Benghazi investigations, what is unmistakable is that the same media that used all its power and influence to persecute and prosecute Richard Nixon for Watergate is now using that influence to protect the guilty of the Benghazi incident. The mighty power of the Fourth Estate, the protector of the best interests of the American public, is now the willing lap dog of the sitting President and his other co-conspirators.
So a White House sponsored cover up that should have angry Americans marching in the streets for the impeachment of the President is now being portrayed openly by his loyal media and political spinmeisters as a witch hunt by Obama's political enemies conducted not for purposes of finding the truth or correcting an injustice, but for purely partisan reasons. Shortly, we'll be hearing that it's all a racist conspiracy by the GOP to slander the good name of the Black Savior. He's played that card so often, the spots should be worn off by now.
While the feckless hacks of the Keystone Kops Congress focus debate the status of the Second Amendment, it's clear to me that we should also be seriously considering the self evident fecklessness of the First Amendment. When the media protected by such provisions willingly devotes itself to promoting the lies and corruption of the President, it clearly has no current value.
If the American media had the same perspective forty years ago, Watergate would never have been a public issue, there would have been no subsequent "President Ford" and America might never have experienced the misfortune of "President" Jimmy Carter. One can only wonder, fearfully, what the current voluntary subservience to the White House by the American media will mean for the future of America.

Dude! Paragraphs, please. I can't read blobs like this. Well, I can, but it's tough.

joe

[Homesick]

Originally Posted by streetg

And our liberal friends here ??? Well, if you find any of this disgustingly corrupt your just a teabilly, a bigot, a racist..
Good job guys.....

You forgot "Wingnut".

joe

[johnjzjz]

Originally Posted by Homesick

Dude! Paragraphs, please. I can't read blobs like this. Well, I can, but it's tough.

joe

sorry i dont know leftest ebonics sooo -- ( ebonics >>> A poor excuse for a failure to grasp the basics of english. When in doubt, throw an "izzle" sound in the middle of any word of just string random thoughts together and insinuate that they actually mean something. When backed into a corner, you can always claim that it has something to do with a sort of symbolism or is a defining trait that makes your race great, versus own up to the fact that it is essentially laziness at it's finest. so as you see i cant help -

[RGRider]

Yep, I'm sure they're completely unbiased.

Spouses and siblings. The ties that bind, a White House to a mainstream media.

[webco2]

Originally Posted by webco2

The hearings in congress are starting to get some answers now.

Do try to catch at least a few minutes of the hearings.

[Waffen]

Rather insestious isn't it?