» Site Navigation |
|
»
»
»
» Motorcycle Forums
|
|
 |
|
12-25-2010, 08:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: california
Posts: 24
|
S&S 88"or 100" engine pro's and con's ?
Hello everyone, we are going to be purchasing a 88 or 100" S&S complete motor for my Pop's 88 soft tail springer. I would think the 100" would be the better choice for extra torque. Unfortunately, the current motor in the bike is toast, as well as cracked cases(89 inch sidewinder stroker which ripped). So, a complete S&S motor is now going in. Suggestions from anybody with experience with these motor choices would be awesome.. thanks ahead of time.
__________________
1995 FXDWG
SE heads
SE 10.5-1 forged pistons .010
Cometic .030 head gaskets
SE-57 cam
SE easy chromoly push rods
SE 10MM plug wires
SE clutch
S&S roller rockers
S&S tappets
S&S reed breather
Mikuni HSR42
Acell adjustable single fire ignition/high output coil
SE/K&N air filter
Thunderheader
Pingel High flow petcock
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-25-2010, 08:57 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 1,587
|
I have run them both. The 100" is 4" x 4" and needed higher rpm to get my old heritage moving. The 88" is 3 5/8" bore x 4 1/4" stroke and seemed to make torque earlier.
I never had either motor on the dyno, but the longer stroke of the 88" was definately noticable by the butt-o-meter.
Both motors were fun.
|
|
|
12-25-2010, 10:17 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 350
|
Why not go bigger? They have a 111 that bolts right into your frame. Claims to have lots of torque and less vibration, which would be nice for that solid mount. Maybe a 124, but is pricey. Do you care about being epa certified? I didn't see an 88 inch option on their web site. I wish I had a 124 in my old softail, but cases kept me at 106. http://www.sscycle.com/product/cart....detail&p=21080
|
|
|
12-26-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: May 2009
Location: arkansas
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 427sbc
Hello everyone, we are going to be purchasing a 88 or 100" S&S complete motor for my Pop's 88 soft tail springer. I would think the 100" would be the better choice for extra torque. Unfortunately, the current motor in the bike is toast, as well as cracked cases(89 inch sidewinder stroker which ripped). So, a complete S&S motor is now going in. Suggestions from anybody with experience with these motor choices would be awesome.. thanks ahead of time.
|
How much of the internals are still good on the 89 incher? Crank?
__________________
Ride it 'till the wheels fall off!
|
|
|
12-26-2010, 08:50 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: california
Posts: 24
|
the s&s sidewinder flywheels, pinion shaft, rod, rod bearings, sprocket shaft, are all good, thats about it....
__________________
1995 FXDWG
SE heads
SE 10.5-1 forged pistons .010
Cometic .030 head gaskets
SE-57 cam
SE easy chromoly push rods
SE 10MM plug wires
SE clutch
S&S roller rockers
S&S tappets
S&S reed breather
Mikuni HSR42
Acell adjustable single fire ignition/high output coil
SE/K&N air filter
Thunderheader
Pingel High flow petcock
|
|
|
12-26-2010, 08:57 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 1,587
|
If you still have the old crank or a similar evo crank, you could swap out the stroker crank for an oem unit and send the whole mess back to harley to be remanufactured. From the sounds of it you will get back an entirely new engine. Then with the new engine, it is a simple set of new pistons for your stroker crank and bam, you have a brand new 89" stroker for less than $2,500 and some work.
|
|
|
12-27-2010, 07:04 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
155" R&R TwinCam
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Windham,Maine
Posts: 2,867
|
Can only speak for 93" Shovel I beat on for 10 yrs and a 124" Sidewinder have owned since 02,you will never find a better powerplant.Good Luck
__________________
06 RK,155" R&R TwinCam
00 Boss Hoss, 427" SB2 sbc/w Nos
05 RK project bike
Whizzer motorbike
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:07 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Seasoned Rider
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: madison ohio
Posts: 67
|
88 incher runs great!!
I have the 88 in my bike and it runs great. I have never riden a bike with the 100 in it though.With some porting and the right cam this thing rips.
__________________
 1998 cmc
88" S&S 95 hp 102 torque
38 coat custom ghost flame paint by Snider Sr.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 08:34 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 317
|
I have run the 88 in my fxr. Great motor. I am going to put that motor in my project fxr soon. Very reliable, lots of fun.
__________________
2008 FXDF
|
|
|
02-04-2011, 01:44 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shingletown CA
Posts: 7
|
something to consider with the big S&S mills......they are still using shovelhead style shafts and bearings.....Sure it keeps pricing down, and less surface area means less friction, so quicker RPMs, but that also shortens longevity.....The smaller engines are great, but I would never go above 113 for my own use....and even then my little sister hung the rods for hers through the bottom of her cases. basically what I am saying is that they are bar hopper engines
new Ultima has decent bottom ends, only because they contract parts from Jims (old ones were junk). TP is good, but cammed to light for their potential. Jims has great products, but their heads really need porting and polishing right from the factory, and their cam profiles are a little weak in the knees. Merch is the way to go for big power right out of a crate.....
I ride a 129 custom build daily....not so good on gas, but when set up right they can be a lot of fun.....I use the jims bottom end, and it balances better then the 95 inch HD engine that came out of the bike
Last edited by heretic; 02-04-2011 at 01:50 PM.
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 07:30 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
build it
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 1,041
|
Heretic,
Could you expand on the above post? I didn't know Merch was still in business?, That is the first time I've heard that S&S had a lesser bottom end compared to a JIMs, Ultima, and TP Engineering, I've heard that they are equally as good but never better.
I know the bearings on the big end of the rod from S&S used to use 21rollers, but have consequently decreased the number of rollers to 19. Is that what you were talking about?
I know the SA cases can handle double timkens on both sides of the crank, not sure about the ULtima, TP, or Jims units though, despite them being stout pieces.
|
|
|
02-08-2011, 05:58 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shingletown CA
Posts: 7
|
not only are there fewer rollers, but narrower surface area as well..... if I was going to use an S&S bottom end for a big incher, I would be getting ahold of the guys at RB racing....They have better bearings available or the S&S mills.......I will admit that narrower surface area, and fewer rollers will nt hurt most of the buyers of those big inch engines. These will mostly be in bar hoppers or hot rods, that are torn down regularly.....they will not see the miles that a lot of stock bikes will see......but for me, I want to know that I can take my hot rod cross country, if I want. I want to know that mine will not scar the bottom end if I am caught in traffic
I am not really sure what merch is doing. I had heard that they were through, but I have seen quite a few of their engines available lately....I have to think something is going on there, if engines are available
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 05:12 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
155" R&R TwinCam
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Windham,Maine
Posts: 2,867
|
The 124" S&S motors have proven themselves time and time again regularly achieveing the 100k mark.No worries whatsoever in the lower ends of these motors,provided they are regularly maintained and not beat to an early death.
__________________
06 RK,155" R&R TwinCam
00 Boss Hoss, 427" SB2 sbc/w Nos
05 RK project bike
Whizzer motorbike
|
|
|
02-10-2011, 08:59 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
IronButt
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Michigan 15 Minutes East Of Hell
Posts: 1,292
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 60195
If you still have the old crank or a similar evo crank, you could swap out the stroker crank for an oem unit and send the whole mess back to harley to be remanufactured. From the sounds of it you will get back an entirely new engine. Then with the new engine, it is a simple set of new pistons for your stroker crank and bam, you have a brand new 89" stroker for less than $2,500 and some work.
|
Can't used cracked cases for a core with the exchange program.
__________________
Ride Safe ..... Ride Often
2009 FLHTCU ( BLACK, OF COURSE ! )
1992 FLHTCU ( BLACK, OF COURSE ! )
1979 FXEF STROKER ( BLACK, OF COURSE ! )
AMA MEMBER / ABATE MEMBER
|
|
|
02-23-2011, 02:26 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
FNG :)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: california
Posts: 24
|
Good info , thanks for all the input...
Looks like its a set of Ultima cases, and the best HD crank builder in SLC is rebuilding/balancing the sidewinder crank and bottom end for my old man... SO it will be a ripper and better than before since this was never correctly balanced and trued by the previous builder..
__________________
1995 FXDWG
SE heads
SE 10.5-1 forged pistons .010
Cometic .030 head gaskets
SE-57 cam
SE easy chromoly push rods
SE 10MM plug wires
SE clutch
S&S roller rockers
S&S tappets
S&S reed breather
Mikuni HSR42
Acell adjustable single fire ignition/high output coil
SE/K&N air filter
Thunderheader
Pingel High flow petcock
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|