Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rickr01
Can somone in the know and unbiased tell me what is suppose to be wrong with SYN 3. Is there really nothing and everyone is just irked off because Harley has changed their toon?? Syn 3 has to be at least better then the dino I was running???
How about some concrete answers. All this oil data is ok if your a chemical engineer. I just want to know if it is a decent oil, and if it's better then dino. George how about an unbiased direct answer on that question not on which brand is better Amsoil or Harley.
|
According to Amsoil after they tested Harleys new syn 3 they reported it to be a very good full synthetic oil made by a reputable oil relabeler. Back in Feb 2003 there was many post on this subject so you might want to do a search for it. I had copied their press release on it and also what Amsoil had to say about it. If I didn't use Amsoil, Mobil would be my next choice followed by Syn3.
Keep in mind that most full synthetics on the market today are actually 100% petroelum oils that have undergone a hydro-cracking process to remove more impurities from the oil and they are allowed to call this dino oil full synthetic. They are all good oils, but don't quite measure up to the chemical based 100% pure synthetics.
.gif "Wheeldock.com")
